Even if, if, if, if you were absolutely correct, CPL, you know that he is NOT prepared to acknowledge this. Please read my post on 'belief'. You are as likely to be posting as a Mormon as he (Blaine) is likely to be posting as what you deem to be a 'christian'.
If there is present on TT a six day young earth creationist, can you or anyone on TT imagine them forfeiting this 'belief' in order to believe 'teleological evolutionism'? Impossible? No! Likely? Snowball's chance... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: June 13, 2005 08:55 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah > Baline, > > Sometimes it is right to doubt. But, when shown the evidence, even Thomas > believed. We will only know for sure when you present the facts and let me > evaluate them. The point is that if there is no real evidence, then the > scripture is most likely not related to the anecdote at all. > > Blaine, are you willing to admit that since there is no real evidence, > then it is possible that the scripture is not related to the anecdote? > > Perry > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah > >Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:55:37 EDT > > > > > > > >Blaine: Probably nothing that would satisfy your "Doubting Thomas" > >attitude, Perry. > > > >In a message dated 6/11/2005 10:34:43 PM Mountain Standard Time, > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >Yes, I have heard that story, but that does not relate the event to the > >Isaiah passage. We still have two separate stories with no ties other than > >some common words. One from scripture, one anecdotal. Do you have anything > >that actually links them? > > > >Perry > > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Reply-To: [email protected] > > >To: [email protected] > > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Hill Cumorah > > >Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:28:12 EDT > > > > > > > > > > > >Blaine: Have you not read/heard the story of Martin Harris taking > > >characters copied from the plates (by JS) to Professor Charles Anthon, > >and > > > > >first > > >being told they were true characters, but then being rebuffed by him > >when > > >he was > > >told a portion of the plates were sealed, and therefore could not be > > >dellivered to him for translation? > > > > > >In a message dated 6/11/2005 8:18:53 PM Mountain Standard Time, > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > >Blaine wrote: The sealed portion has yet to be translated, but > >contains > > >"the vision of all." see Isaiah. 29:11 > > > > > > > > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
