Is the BoM more trustworthy than the Bible, from your perspective?
I am going to the Hill Cumorah pag
I have seen it hundreds of times, and it is Awesome as far as it is Translated correctly!
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Blaine wrote:
> yes, I believe the BoM was needed to set
> things straight. I think the Bible is the word
> of God as far as it is translated correctly, and
> as far as the writers had things straight in the
> first place. The BoM however, has it straight,
> I think, as it was supposed to be, or meant
> to be. IOW, I believe the BoM has original
> Christianity as it was taught by the Lord himself.
It sounds like you consider the BoM to be more trustworthy than the Bible.
Am I hearing you right?
It sounds like you consider the Bible has experienced corruption and hence
must be translated better to get back to the original intent, but the BoM is
much more pure and accurate and not subject to the need to be translated
correctly.
Am I understanding you right?
I am not looking for anything to pounce on you about. I'm just trying to
understand your perspective.
DaveH, is this also how you view the Bible and the BoM? Is the BoM more
trustworthy than the Bible, from your perspective?
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
