Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14

[David Miller]

For the record, John, there is no ad hominem argument in my post below.  I spoke only toward your statements, not toward you personally.  Identifying your statement as a tautology is not an ad hominem argument.    For what its worth, I did not use any dictionary for this very simple post, so please stop insulting my intelligence.   Peace be with you. David Miller. ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 7:03 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14 Working that dictionary pretty hard, today, aren't ya !  I don't major in double talk, DAvid.   When I say that "....you do not agree in total with anyone,"  the point is clear and (IMO) without debate  .....  your ad homs not withstanding.   But, good try.   JD    -----Original Message----- From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:04:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14 JD wrote: > The fact is this, David, you do not agree in > total with anyone - neither do I or Judy or > anyone else. I believe there are many men and women with whom I am in total agreement with. This does not mean that we see everything identically. If you are trying to say that nobody sees everything exactly in the same way, then that is another one of your meaningless tautologies, a statement which is true but which adds nothing to our mutual understanding. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.