Re: [TruthTalk] The Spalding Enigma

[Blainerb473]

DavidM wrote: It seems to me that the statement sets up a false idea of what understanding is. Understanding that is based upon emotion is lame and prone to all kinds of error and falsehood. It seems to me that the statement says that one must commit oneself to an object before they can understand it. This suggests, as you say, that understanding is not based upon logic, but upon commitment of the mind regardless of facts. Upon what basis can one commit oneself if not understanding? The only thing I can think of is emotion. Maybe someone else can suggest some other motivation for making a commitment. Blainer:  Motivation to believe or disbelieve can come from other sources than emotion.    I am talking mainly about approval from significant others, such as parents, TT members, friends, etc.  I see it every day.  I see it operate constantly on TT.  Disapproval from significant others is also a powerful deter rant to believing what otherwise would be seen as true.  Independence of spirit is key to being a true seeker of truth.   Jesus Christ was highly independent.  His commitment to the truth exceeded all.  Truth, and obedience to His Father, the source of all truth,  were His highest priorities.  How close do we come to being Christ-like in this respect, is the question we all need to face.