Judyt: My point is that he was not fully God in the flesh and neither was
he fully man
because he is constantly referred to as a "holy child" He was holy from
birth
Mankind is not and this is why we so desperately need him and why he
died for us
He is what He is and we need to be open to receive that revelation
from
the Lord rather than die for some creed that misrepresents Him for fear of
heresy.
The important thing is that we be conformed to His image before he returns
for us.
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:34:46 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Absolutely? Your point? Jd
-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:11:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:John 16:13,14
Judy wrote: >> He was on earth as the Son of God. ... >> God is omnipotent and omnipresent, transcendent >> etc. When he came in a flesh body Jesus was none >> of these, in fact He plainly said "The Father is greater >> than I". JD wrote: > Don't be fooled. The scriptures plainly teach that > Jesus Christ was God and man. Do either of you think that being a Son of God is different than being God? Would not being a Son of God make him God just as being a Son of Man makes him man? Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
