The same Bill who wrote:
"I also know that I am not as good a communicator as I want to be and ought to be, and so I keep trying to better my skills in that area and admit in the meantime my deficiencies."  Now writes: 
 
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:02:59 -0600 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yeah, John, I used the term "cadaver" in a metaphorical sense to point out the absurdity of thinking that spiritually dead humans could decide to respond to matters of spiritual importance. If their spirit is literally dead, they would not have the capability of making such choices. I said something like, How can one who is spiritually dead make a free-will determination to believe and hence be born again, so as to be made alive? Cadavers can not make choices, let alone act upon them. That set off fire storm of false accusations from the one among us who lacks the ability to determine when language is meant to be taken literally and when it is metaphorical in its thrust; hence the charge that I thought Jesus and Paul to be referring to corpses and physically dead bodies. Not hardly! So rock on, John. You're on the right track. Bill
jt: Nothing wrong with my understanding of Biblical language Bill but your "deficiencies" make it extremely difficult to
communicate in this arena.  In the past I have made the same points over and over and over yet apparently you can not or will not see.
 
Spiritual death has nothing whatsoever to do with cadavers and corpses and apparently spiritual death is absent from the writings you are attempting to synthesize.  However, it is a scriptural reality and when we want to understand scripture we need to go to scripture and allow the Holy Spirit lead us into Truth or we will be forever learning and never apprehending.
 

Reply via email to