JD wrote: > Actually, I never do this. DM represented my > presentation as one which based its argument on > the meaning of "dunamis." That was never the > basis for my argument. This highlighted DM quotation > was not representative of why I believe Satan has only > fakery as his power to deceive. Laziness in reading > will not a good student make, Linda.
John, you wrote the following argument: > Specifically, the word used in this text is sameion > (as opposed to dunamis ) and is translated "signs" > in the NASV. The fact remains that Stan has no > real power. His power was destroyed at the cross. Can you see how I might perceive your implication here to be that because "dunamis" was not used, Satan has no real power? "Dunamis" is the Greek word for "power." Your argument here was that because the Greek word for power was not used, then the fact remains that Satan has no real power because his power was destroyed at the cross. Lazy reading or lazy writing? Did you mean that Stan has no real power? Whose Stan? :-) Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
