|
Fellows, this discussion should be titled Calvin
and Calvin and is one more demonstration of how mankind refuses to accept the Word of God as well as the God of the Word, so
that each time a contradiction becomes apparent there arises a new
rationalization to explain it away. It is uncanny.
There is for sure nothing new under the sun.
Same ol' fallen Adamic flesh nature that refused to take responsibility for his
choice and action back then in that garden in Mesopotamia continues to
refuse to take responsibility now.
Back then it was "the woman you gave me"
Today we hold to doctrines that do not conform
us to godliness and holiness and so we claim it is "God's decree" for
some to be saved and others lost because He ordained for some to
be elect (in eis) and for others to be damned. So these doctrines
have this God of love who is full of mercy and lovingkindness now
violating His Own Word because these doctrines make Him a respecter of
persons.
Bottom line is that if one is "elect" they
have it "made in the shade" (and naturally all who authored these doctrines
were part of the elect) because it is all done for them and they lack nothing.
The rest are decreed to be headed for hell no matter what because of what God
has ordained for them. These are the grounds upon which you two
agree. Sad, sad, sad, shame, shame, shame.
andrew writes:
The idea that the written code has less authority on NT believers than OT believers would mean that God's demand for holiness has changed
(and thus, God has changed.)
john: Only that the
administration of His will has changed -- at least in terms
of emphasis.
Andrew: But He is the same, yesterday, today and
forever.
john: Such a statement does not challenge
the fact that His administration has many
differing expressions.
Andrew: And He gives some the perfect righteousness of Christ,
whilst His wrath abides on the rest.
john: Election is in
(eis) Christ and has no predetermination outside that
relationship.
Andrew: The first group have no
condemnation in Christ Jesus --and have full assurance that they
have the imputed righteousness. The others have been
reprobated based on God's will, and will
be go to hell. But all must obey the written
code.
|
- [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted Andrew C. Bain
- Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted David Miller
- RE: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted David Miller
- [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted knpraise
- RE: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Antinomianism Refuted Judy Taylor

