LOL. Yeah, John, I thought that was funny. The Scriptures are profitable for reproof and correction and instruction, to make the man of God perfect. WHAT IF WE ARE QUOTING SCRIPTURE TO SOMEONE WHO IS NOT A MAN OF GOD? Maybe that's why Scripture won't bring the issue to resolution! Yeah, that is a humorous consideration.
Good night, John. May you have a peaceful night. David Miller. ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] ; [email protected] Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 11:39 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now You say this: Of course, the > Scriptures won't help if you are dealing with someone who is not a man of > God. :-) And you find this funny? You see this as a opportunity for a tongue in cheek defense? Well, this is getting ridiculous. Ten four, jd -------------- Original message -------------- From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You just don't know me, JD. If I delivered the sentence in person, you > would see a smile, and maybe even a laugh. I have to admit too that my > tongue was pressed firmly against my cheek with that sentence before the > smilie. I'm just trying to lighten things up a little. > > David Miller. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected] ; [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 10:52 PM > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now > > > Why in the world do you put a "happy face" behind a statment that you do > not > intend to be funny or even tongue in cheek? You do it often and it is > never funny. > > jd > -------------- Or iginal message -------------- > From: "David Miller" > > > Wrong again, Lance. You have overlooked the very reason the Scriptures > > have > > been given to us. The Scriptures are profitable for reproof, for > > correction, and for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God > > may > > be > > perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. Of course, the > > Scriptures won't help if you are dealing with someone who is not a man > > of > > God. :-) > > > > You should consider taking up street preaching in your old age, Lance. > > It > > would help you fulfill the following passage: > > > > Titus 1:9 > > (9) Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may > > be > > able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers. > > > > David Miller. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > F rom: Lance Muir > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 1:05 PM > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now > > > > > > Going to the Bible will NOT bring the issue to resolution, Dean. Judy, > > DM, > > Gary, Bill, John, even I, though only on the rarest of occasions, can > > muster > > adequate Scriptural support for a 'view'. Sometimes that 'view' is > > God's. > > Sometimes that 'view' is one's own. > > > > ---- Original Message ----- > > From: Dean Moore > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: January 15, 2006 12:57 > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Lance Muir > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: 1/15/2006 12:31:45 PM &g t; > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now > > > > > > EVERY VIEW IS SUPPORTABLE, DEAN!! The better 'taught' one is, the more < > > BR>> comprehensive that person's presentation is. This applies equally > > to > > right > > as well as wrong views. IMO, your view is a wrong view on this matter.. > > > > cd: That of course would make it wrong because it is in contrast to you > > view?So how do we know which view is correct-go to the Bible-or some > > other > > source? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Dean Moore > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: January 15, 2006 12:21 > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now > > > > > > cd: Lance you need to recognize that this view is made up of much study > > and > > that I can support it with scripture so it is not something just spoke > > off > > of the top of my head as you seem to suppose. If one is to evaluate the > > speaker then one must also consider the speakers past statements to > > determine the availability of truth offer by the speaker.Which statement > > do > > you want me to support? > > > & gt; > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Lance Muir > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: 1/15/2006 9:13:44 AM > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now > > > > > > Key:'I view'. Please take note as all conversations are similary > > constructed > > JT and DM. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Dean Moore > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: January 15, 2006 09:06 > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now > > > > > > cd: I view the word "unbelief" to portray a larger image than what has > > been > > stated in this discussion. To have unbelief is not only to reject the > > person > > of Christ but to also reject his words which very clearly points one > > towards > > God's law and God's grace. So if John 3:18 is correct then one must > > receive > > this larger image if not on new birth then later at the bidding of the > > Holy > > Ghost. Note and point : One sin can send one to hell if there is refusal > > of > > compliance to the conviction power of the Spirit (1 Cor 6:9)-so be not > > deceived-but sin can also make one least in the kingdom of heaven.This > > speaks of a personal judgement between the person and God. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Judy Taylor > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected] > > Sent: 1/15/2006 8 :28:37 AM > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now > > > > > > If this Victor person is correct and "UNBELIEF" is the predicament > > humanity > > is in then why was the Holy Spirit > > sent to reprove the WORLD (note this is not just God's covenant ppl) of > > SIN, > > righteousness, and judgment? > > (John 16:8) Why didn't God send Him as an antidote to "unbelief" only if > > this is the main problem?? > > > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:50:35 -0500 "Lance Muir" > > writes: > > > > ----- Original Messag e ----- > > From: Debbie Sawczak > > To: 'Lance Muir' > > Sent: January 14, 2006 17:02 > > Subject: OK, done working for now > > > > > > paragraph in this lecture of Victor's: > > > > I've often said, too, that the hardest part of any service of worship > > for > > th e minister is the children's story, because nearly all the children's > > stories here are moralistic bromides. It's just moralistic bromide. And > > the > > Gospel isn't heard because we assume that children can't understand the > > Gospel. They can be taught not to steal, and they can be taught not to > > swear, but they can't understand the Gospel. This is ridiculous, but > > keep > > your eye on the Christian education wing of your church or denomination, > > because that's where the Gospel goes down. > > > > It strikes me that street preaching and children's sermons go down the > > same > > wrong path! > > > > Paragraph from next lecture: > > > > The protestant refor mers maintain that the root problem is Sin and it > > gives > > rise to sins. But be sure you know which is which, or you will never > > come > > to > > terms with the Gospel. Morality maintains that little "s" sins plural is > > the > > human predicament. The Gospel maintains that capital "S" Sin singular - > > unbelief - is the predicament. > > > > This is the difference between David's understanding of repentance and > > Bill's/JD's. > > > > D > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/229 - Release Date: > > 1/13/2006 > > > > ---------- > > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may > > know how > > you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a > > friend > > who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > > he will be subscribed. > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may > know how > you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.. If you have a > friend > who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > he will be subscribed. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
