|
I was just wanting to better understand
what you were wanting me to agree with in your statement: we agree if you view the Human part to also have
divine thoughts. Having read your response I am comfortable that we can
agree. The word "preoccupied" has a ring to it with which I am not completely
satisfied, but I believe the man Jesus was preoccupied with doing the will of
his heavenly Father; hence his thought-life was fully intuned to the
divine.
If you had responded by saying that the man Jesus did not have
a human mind, or a human spirit, or a human soul, then I would have had to
disagree; for then he would not have been like us in every way (cf. Heb
2.17).
And, while I understood what you were saying, I also hesitate
to speak of the person of Christ in terms of "parts": if he is fully human and
fully divine, then he is not partly one and partly the other. Anyway, I knew
what you meant and could thus look through it.
Thanks,
Bill
|
- Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] love and trinity THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST ... David Miller
- Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] love and trinity THE HUMANITY OF CH... Taylor
- Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] love and trinity THE HUMANITY OF CH... Taylor
- Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] love and trinity THE HUMANITY OF CH... Judy Taylor
- Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] love and trinity THE HUMANITY OF CH... Judy Taylor
- Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] love and trinity THE HUMANITY OF CH... knpraise
- Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] love and trinity THE HUMANITY OF CH... Judy Taylor
- [TruthTalk] love and trinity THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST IS ... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] love and trinity THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST... Dean Moore

