DAVEH:  Again, thanx for the explanation.  Do you feel that the OT sacrificial rites were similarly related....that is, were signs of a covenant?  If so, why do you think they needed to be replicated?

David Miller wrote:
DaveH wrote:
  
Do you view circumcision in a similar light
as baptism...it being a covenant?
    

Yes, I view it in a similar light, but I would not use the words you used, 
"it being a covenant."  Circumcision is a sign of the convenant, actually 
used for more than one covenant in history (both Abrahamic and Sinaitic 
covenants for example), and baptism also serves this purpose, as a sign of a 
covenant with God through Jesus Christ.  I believe that a covenant sign is 
one reason that Jesus was himself baptized by John.  However, baptism has 
other purposes as well, and one is to provide a means of establishing faith 
in Jesus Christ.  It is a vehicle for expressing faith, the same way that an 
automobile is a method of allowing gasoline or diesel to propel cars.

David Miller. 

  

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.

Reply via email to