Re: [TruthTalk] Physics, Astronomy and Genesis chapters 1-11

[Dave Hansen]

DAVEH:   Was there a question somewhere in there, Kevin? Kevin Deegan wrote: And I would think that it would be easy for you to answer why you take part of the same sentence/verse figurative and another literal. I asked; you avoided, because there is no logical reason to do so, just an Emotive one! --- Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DAVEH: I would think anybody who understands that the argument of using a burning bush as evidence to prove that God is capable of creating an *unquenchable fire* is a bit weak if that *unquenchable fire* (burning bush) has been quenched. ShieldsFamily wrote: Yours? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ** DAVEH: Not at all, Izzy. It is simply an observation of illogic. ShieldsFamily wrote: Oh, I guess God forgot how to do that particular trick, eh? iz ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Doesn't that teach us something about God's * *abilities of creating an unquenchable fire?* DAVEH: Only if the bush is still burning. David Miller wrote: DaveH, I agree with Judy here. The argument of a "literal impossibility" is a little weak when we are talking about God. Moses did see a bush that was burning but not consumed. *Doesn't that teach us something about God's * *abilities of creating an unquenchable fire?* David Miller Why try to confuse Conor right off the bat Lance? Genesis is not a "science book" per se. Although the writer of Genesis is also the God who created all that is called "science" Are you asking Conor to interpret Genesis in the light of Astronomy and Physics? Just this morning I read this interaction between DaveH and KevinD (I think) ... KD: That is explained by the fire and brimstone imagery that is in reality endless torment. a fire which cannot be consumed, even an unquenchable fire DAVEH: More imagery that is physically an impossibility. Fire can be extinguished, whereas mental torment can go on forever. So tell me - What is a physical impossibility for God? The same God who delivered what he had promised to Abraham and Sarah when they were 90 and 100yrs old respectively. A God who was able to roll back the Red Sea until his people crossed and afterward kept them in the desert for 40yrs feeding them with manna from heaven and keeping their clothes from wearing out and their feet from swelling. The same God who stopped the sun for 24 hours and caused an axe head to float on water The God who energized His prophet causing him to run for 25 miles in front of Jezebels' chariot and had the ravens feed him while he rested and regrouped in a cave. Tell me - what would be too difficult for a God like this and how can the feeble efforts of man explain Him? On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:57:56 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Conor: Might we hear from you on this? Frame this in whatever fashion suits you. Lance -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.