A Dilluns, 20 de febrer de 2012 13:02:34, Cédric Krier va escriure: > On 20/02/12 12:51 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > > A Diumenge, 19 de febrer de 2012 23:55:49, Cédric Krier va escriure: > > > Also I'm wondering if all the directive should not have a prefix to > > > prevent collision with other extensions, perhaps: tryfield, tryview... > > > > I also thought about it, but decided not to do it this way because > > haven't seen other modules doing adding any kind of prefix. That said, > > if we eventually join menu and fields, we will probably want that to > > make it more understandable. Such as 'tryref' or something like this. > > I think it is not because others don't care we should :-) > Indeed, I even think we should use the full "tryton_" as prefix to make > it really clear to the source reader what it is.
I expect us to use lots of those references, so using a full "tryton_" prefix could be a bit annoying. Specially if one uses inline syntax with 80 cols. I think "tryref" is short and avoids collisions and given the docs will hopefully be in tryton modules, the rst code reader won't have any doubts on what that directive means. -- Albert Cervera i Areny http://www.NaN-tic.com Tel: +34 93 553 18 03 http://twitter.com/albertnan http://www.nan-tic.com/blog -- [email protected] mailing list
