On 15/11/13 15:37 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > 2013/10/26 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > > On 25/10/13 23:35 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > >> 2013/10/25 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > >> > On 25/10/13 11:12 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > >> >> 2013/10/25 <[email protected]>: > >> >> > http://codereview.tryton.org/1311002/ > > I have also one more remarks: > > > > - While rethinking about Operation and WorkCenter, I'm wondering if > > an (Route)Operation should not be composed by a just list of > > machines (or just one) and on the Tracking there will be the > > employee (optional because some machine works without operator). > > Taking into account the employee is necessary for planning production > costs. In order to sell a product to be produced we'll need that > Tryton is able to help the user get the planned cost and that includes > not only the materials but also machine usage and employee's time at > their hourly price. > > > This is because I think with the current design, most of the time > > it will require to encode similar Tracking for the employee and > > the machine. > > I think the Route must include the planned resources (just like BOM > includes the planned materials) but then in the production users will > introduced actual resource and material quantities used.
Here I think you are doing a mistake. If I keep your analogy, employee should be close to lot than material. If you want to be able to compute an estimation of the cost time, you must have a kind of employee group, not the real employee. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpRvG8dzSIiI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
