2013/11/15 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > On 15/11/13 15:37 +0100, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: >> 2013/10/26 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: >> > On 25/10/13 23:35 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: >> >> 2013/10/25 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: >> >> > On 25/10/13 11:12 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: >> >> >> 2013/10/25 <[email protected]>: >> >> >> > http://codereview.tryton.org/1311002/ >> > I have also one more remarks: >> > >> > - While rethinking about Operation and WorkCenter, I'm wondering if >> > an (Route)Operation should not be composed by a just list of >> > machines (or just one) and on the Tracking there will be the >> > employee (optional because some machine works without operator). >> >> Taking into account the employee is necessary for planning production >> costs. In order to sell a product to be produced we'll need that >> Tryton is able to help the user get the planned cost and that includes >> not only the materials but also machine usage and employee's time at >> their hourly price. >> >> > This is because I think with the current design, most of the time >> > it will require to encode similar Tracking for the employee and >> > the machine. >> >> I think the Route must include the planned resources (just like BOM >> includes the planned materials) but then in the production users will >> introduced actual resource and material quantities used. > > Here I think you are doing a mistake. If I keep your analogy, employee > should be close to lot than material. > If you want to be able to compute an estimation of the cost time, you > must have a kind of employee group, not the real employee.
That sounds good to me, that's why we introduced WorkcenterCategory. The thing is that somehow we should be able to put human hours/resources in the Route. -- Albert Cervera i Areny Tel. 93 553 18 03 @albertnan www.NaN-tic.com
