On 20/06/10 12:26 +0200, Udo Spallek wrote: > Hi Cédric, all, > > Am Samstag, den 19.06.2010, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Cédric Krier: > > On 18/06/10 19:29 +0200, Cédric Krier wrote: > > > With the issue1585[1], some questions are raising. I would like to have > > > your > > > opinions on it. So I setup a google moderator questions: > > > http://goo.gl/mod/KvEX > > Guys, you completly fail with this application: > > - Stop creating questions that are comments. > Sorry about my provocation in your 'poll'. For all, yesterday I asked > the question: > "Is it clear, that this poll is a meta poll for final polls or > questions to guide a discussion? Here you do not say 'yes' or 'no' > to answer the question. You say 'yes' or 'no' if you like the > question or find the question is worth to be discussed." > As I can read here[1], > "The service allows the management of feedback from a large number > of people, who can vote for the top questions that they think > should be posed and ask their own." > The key phrase is: "that they think should be posed and ask their own." > So it is neither a poll about direct answers to these questions, nor an > election about our vote for this questions. It is as I said, "a meta > poll for final polls or questions to guide a discussion" > > Cédric, with your last emails it seems to me, you change the use of > google moderator to something else I do not clearly understand. Now it > becomes a weak tool for me to 'poll' or elect about Trytons contribution > requirements. > For me you missed some explanations about the change of use of the tool > and its implications. I would like to request some explanations from > you, please. > 1. What is your goal with the poll? > 2. Did the vote/result legitimate someone to something? > 3. Is it to have an informational survey about the opinion of all people > in the internet in some questions without any other meaning or any other > implication? > 4. Is it an election about answers of the given questions, which bind us > all to answer these questions in future with the result of the 'poll'?
I just wanted to know what was the feeling about the issue we faced with issue1585. If it is not possible and is too much time consuming, I will just take a decision based on what I think people thought which is: - Use real name - Use unique (individual) email addresse - Don't allow @tryton.?? email addresse I have deleted the poll. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpKtAvQ0DHz3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
