A Dissabte, 2 de juliol de 2011 12:34:38, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe va escriure: > On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 15:09 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:11 +0200, Nicolas Évrard wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Yesterday we held the General Meeting of B2CK and the subject of the > > > Tryton Software Foundation was discussed. Please make your voice heard > > > and give us your opinion on this subject so that the foundation's > > > status are the result of a community process. > > > > > > - The foundation aims are to promote Tryton: do marketing stuffs, > > > > > > participate in booth, sponsors developments. The foundation > > > will not have its word on the technical side of Tryton. > > > > Isn't there a larger organisation/foundation that Tryton can be part of? > > What are the advantages of forming 'yet another' Foundation? > > > > note: I'm not in opposition. I'm just curious. > > Watching as this discussion is getting really long, I'm not so sure any > more about my neutral position. I'm thinking that existing foundations > already have these details sorted (they've been around for years after > all). So again, the question (which remains unanswered) is, why 'yet > another' foundation?
>From my point of view, it'd be related to marketing reasons. I think it shows the project is stronger to customers if it has its own foundation instead of relying in another one. -- Albert Cervera i Areny http://www.NaN-tic.com OpenERP Partners Tel: +34 93 553 18 03 http://twitter.com/albertnan http://www.nan-tic.com/blog -- [email protected] mailing list
