>
> >Not with the current view.js since it produces <table>'s (which is
>> >probably very fine for tree views, but not for form views concerning
>> >the current matter). Hence this poc to replace form.container
>> >element with <div>. Now of course, out of the box div's won't look
>> >like the gtk client's forms, they need to be applied a grid system.
>> >I guess you could dev your own grid system to prevent it to be
>> >responsive, but that would probably be a lot of work. Or you could
>> >use an existing grid system (like bootstrap or something else) but
>> >then... well, it would be responsive out of the box
>>
>> You're saying that it's impossible to remove the responsive part of
>> bootstrap, am I right?
>>
>
> I'm not saying it is impossible to do anything, I'm saying that creating a
> non-responsive grid-system either from scratch or from a natively (mobile
> first in bootstrap-case) responsive system would require extra work.
> And I am REALLY having a hard time seeing the point of it
> On a desktops/laptops, it would have the same look and feel as the gtk
> client.
> On small devices on which the gtk client doesn't work (hard to reproduce
> an unexistent behavior), it would look slightly different
>
>
> <https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-aiqeNIn-Xmw/UxcnzUAYVzI/AAAAAAAAAK0/yuCWTlZTWEI/s1600/592x360_tryton_gtk.png>
> For reference here is a screenshot of what gtk would look like on a
> 592x360 display which is in my own experience the most common size (about
> 30%) of the device of mobile users.
>
> So if you find someone who is willing to spend time to take the
> responsiveness out of bootstrap or write a non-responsive grid system to
> achieve something unusable.... why not. (It won't be me)
>
> So just in case you haven't tried the code-review here a screenshot of sao
> with the patch on a desktop:
>
>
> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-csFELq6ogas/UxcuJB1cXnI/AAAAAAAAALM/dzeOlB8pTz8/s1600/sao_responsive.png>
>
>
>
> except for the un-implemented freatures and margin/padding tweakings
> needed, it looks pretty much the same to me as the current sao layout
>
>
>> My opinion is that your patch is welcome as long as it can mimic the
>> GTK client behavior.
>>
>
> Imho it does, with additional features for screens on which no-one would
> run the GTK client
>
[edit: changed the screenshot as it was not blurred]
