2014-03-07 19:53 GMT+01:00 Emma <[email protected]>: > Hi Guillem, > > Well, there have been a few changes since the fork was initiated since there > was no willingness to make the changes inside the core, why not take a few > more liberties: > - we are not simply talking about <div>'s but about <div>'s and <fieldset>'s > - extra "former <tr>'s" have been removed (no need for fixed rows in a fluid > grid) > - switch the "xexpand" js resize code with a lighter one > > Since some people were clearly interested in "intermediary modes": > - I took the liberty to link labels of fields to the field inside a single > <div> to allow them to stay together in intermediary modes (heavy code but > only executed once at form creation)
I think this is the kind of things Cédric was trying to note which are going to give bug reports. You cannot safely link labels to fields automatically because Tryton allows much more complex configurations than "label - field" structure. You'll maybe end up with something that renders correctly in many cases but not in all cases, and Cédric is trying to find a solution that works always correctly. I think this is the main point here. Maybe when your proposal is finished or almost finished we see that a small hint can be added in the view definition that allows everything to work correctly but it seems to me that it is too soon to know that. > As you can see from the screenshots, thinks are going well for the sao fork, > there are still missing things (like toggleable menu in "PDA mode") and a > few glitches but I personnally like (it would be sad if I didn't :-p ) what > has been done so far, which sometimes doesn't stricly (mostly but not > strictly) stick to the GTK behaviour anymore (I didn't see the point) but > seems to me more adapted to the web. Screenshots look pretty good! > > Feel free to comment on any issues or create new ones -- Albert Cervera i Areny Tel. 93 553 18 03 @albertnan www.NaN-tic.com
