On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 2:35:10 AM UTC-4, Cédric Krier wrote: > We could not use 'readonly' attribute because it is not yet an enforced > constraint [1]. So it sounds like the overloading the write method was just to enforce readonly. Are you aware of anything that would break by lifting this constraint (either by using my own version of the address module, or by monkeypatching)?
> I really think that you should use the party_relationship module and > never use an address as a party. Companies are made up of individuals. This is a real-world concept that Tryton should embrace modeling it (when appropriate to a given deployment). I don't love party_communication, but think it is better than party_relationship for our needs. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/2565f272-56f3-4abd-8d50-74a6e9ebcc12%40googlegroups.com.
