On 2017-09-28 07:46, Jon Levy wrote: > > It is also possible to add a Many2Many instead of the One2Many relations > > but the relation needs to be typed. > > I don't understand. Is there a way to coerce Many2Many to provide the > desired behavior on a Many2One field--i.e., giving access to the > fields on the underlying record?
I mean any One2Many for which the target has a Many2One, can be displayed as a Many2Many. But adding new record can only work if the target can be filled with only the source and origin. So it is not possible for the relationship because it needs the type of relation. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20170928145505.GQ3626%40kei.
