On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 2:35:05 AM UTC-4, Cédric Krier wrote: > I guess we would need to have a widget similar to One2Many but for > Many2One. Yes, that would be awesome. Indeed, I think it would be transformative to the interfaces that Tryton allows.
> It is also possible to add a Many2Many instead of the One2Many relations > but the relation needs to be typed. I don't understand. Is there a way to coerce Many2Many to provide the desired behavior on a Many2One field--i.e., giving access to the fields on the underlying record? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/8097cc75-5f45-4cc4-8c06-d5c7c625d6af%40googlegroups.com.
