On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 9:39:52 PM UTC-4, Jon Levy wrote: > On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 11:50:07 AM UTC-4, Cédric Krier wrote: > > On 2017-09-27 08:25, Jon Levy wrote: > > > Companies are made up of individuals. This is a real-world concept > > > that Tryton should embrace modeling it (when appropriate to a given > > > > And Tryton does with the module party_relationship . . . > > Using addresses to modeling employees is so wrong because well an > > address is a location > > I take your point that, as the maintainer, you want address to mean address > (instead of it meaning individual). The UI for party_relationship makes it > very inconvenient to open up a party/company and figure the name of an > employee to call. If there is UI built for this, please let me know. I will > go ahead and try to design one and, if that works, will try to migrate away > from party_communication.
Trying to solve part of the UI problem: a One2Many field has the ability to show the form view of the related model, but as far as I know a Many2One does not. This means that, in order to edit the party in party_relationship you need to first open the relation and then open the related party in a pop-up. Am I understanding that right? (It is less convenient to go directly to the party because the user will want to go directly to the most important entity (ie the company), rather than locate the company staff member from among the entire sea of parties (especially when identical names are a possibility). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/66353996-6b0a-4fde-a56a-dedf36db4730%40googlegroups.com.
