When he says "Not Production Grade", it just means it aint reached the level of maturity to be termed Production Grade.
The subsequent releases of TSL 3.x should get it closer to that, which does not mean your going to be amidst serious issues using 3.0. Those who have stuck with TSL earlier are still sticking with it today. There is still good going on and is expected. Lets see what the next release of TSL 3.x should bring for us. Still here... ;) Aristo On 5/5/06, Kaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > tsl 3 is definitely *not* production grade.. > > Definitely? Is it really that bad? Should I avoid it like the plague? > I'm asking because I'm in the process of setting up a new server > (Apache/PHP) and I was seriously considering going with 3 instead of 2.2. > > I've had TSL 3 running one of my fileservers, and it has done a great > job so far. No issues. It is of course only running Samba and it's not > very stressed, but still.. :o) > > Regards, > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > tsl-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss > -- Thanks and Regards Aristo Mob # +91 9980089699 Registered Linux User #415170 _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
