[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> tsl 3 is definitely *not* production grade.. > Definitely? Is it really that bad? Should I avoid it like the plague? > I'm asking because I'm in the process of setting up a new server > (Apache/PHP) and I was seriously considering going with 3 instead of 2.2.
Short answer: yes. But thats just my personal 2ct, but with all the other 2ct's i heard on that subject we should have quite a fortune here :) Long answer: i dont like the installer. not at all. even more since there is no kickstart support anymore. i dont like the way tsl3 "feels". and there is the saying: dont use a .0 release. trustix never said a .0 release is considered stable, hence 2.2 is still the officially reconmended stable version for production use. And the people i used to know and trust at trustix over the years left comodo, abandoned tsl (for a reason!), no one from comodo steps up and takes the lead and the responsibility (at least not here on the mailinglist or on #trustix). So i have no idea where trustix will end up, and i followed them through enough bad times (tawie anyone?)... Btw, anyone tried CentOS on IBM zSeries? Danny _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
