ehlo, Kaz writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> tsl 3 is definitely *not* production grade.. > > Definitely? Is it really that bad? Should I avoid it like the plague? > I'm asking because I'm in the process of setting up a new server > (Apache/PHP) and I was seriously considering going with 3 instead of 2.2. saying not *production* grade was to say that looking at how 3.0 package are built i found some "glitches" an some "work in progress" things.. thats why the statement... > > I've had TSL 3 running one of my fileservers, and it has done a great > job so far. No issues. It is of course only running Samba and it's not > very stressed, but still.. :o) > > Regards, > Thomas cheers Fremen _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list tsl-discuss@lists.trustix.org http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
