[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> tsl 3 is definitely *not* production grade.. >> Definitely? Is it really that bad? Should I avoid it like the plague? >> I'm asking because I'm in the process of setting up a new server >> (Apache/PHP) and I was seriously considering going with 3 instead of 2.2. > > saying not *production* grade was to say that looking at how 3.0 package are > built i found some "glitches" an some "work in progress" things.. > thats why the statement...
I found a major glitch in the php5 packaging the other day.. which finally answers why pear is so broken in tsl packages. I commented on the pear bug in bugzilla, and if someone takes a couple seconds one day to read it, the php package should get fixed soon :P .. and that affects TSL 2.2, not just TSL 3 -- Cheers, Morten :wq _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list tsl-discuss@lists.trustix.org http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
