On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Ajith Vargese Thampi wrote: >> "technically swup should work without any problems, as simple upgrading to >> 3.0.5 was considered as part of this release." > Yup, i still do beleive that everything should be upgradable from 3.0 to > 3.0.5. and swup does let upgrade without much issues*. > (never did i mention it would be perfect to upgrade to a 3.0.5 BETA though.
Yes i'm well aware of "testing a beta might and probably will break things". :-) But i'm still thinking that updating a software raid is one of the most basic tests... > BTW, glad to know about you having worked as one of the TSL guys ;) :-) > Yea, I guess you can begin. I/We would really love to hear more about it. We > could all learn something from this. You got me wrong here :-) I am not really qualified to say something about "what makes TSL 3.x more secure than other distros", since i havent looked into TSL 3.x closely. Seeing anaconda and kickstart removed was a major showstopper for me... So what i ment was: tell us what makes TSL so ubersecure. The beta release note just mentiones "quick security bugfixes" (didnt compare the fix-times, so i cant do any judgement here), SWUP (i personaly think yum is superior, same functionality but much faster) and CP+ for easy management (personaly, i'm scared when i read easy web management, but thats just my CLI loving mind talking...) Whats TSLs current use of (or statement to): - SELinux - RBAC - ASLR etc? Danny -- Q: Gentoo is too hard to install = http://www.cyberdelia.de and I feel like whining. = [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Please see /dev/null. = (from the gentoo installer FAQ) = \o/ _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
