Fwiw, ick. I am hoping the pending UDP options and their frag support while allowing frag traversal of NATs will help discourage use of TCP this way.
Joe > On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <i...@kuehlewind.net> > wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > no, this is more a topic that we as the AD would like to discuss with the > community as we see more and more work that adds TCP encapsulation to all > kind of protocols for middlebox traversal issues. > > Mirja > >> Am 07.03.2018 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com>: >> >> >> >> On Mar 7, 2018 8:16 AM, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <i...@kuehlewind.net> >> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> we plan to have a short (1h) TSV area meeting in London and are scheduled for >> >> tsvarea Session 1 (1:00:00) >> Monday, Afternoon Session III 1740-1840 >> Room Name: Sandringham size: 300 >> >> We just uploaded the planned agenda: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-tsvarea >> >> Besides the usual updates and status report, we are planning for a >> discussion about TCP encapsulation with a corresponding presentation about >> experience with TCP encapsulation for IKE. >> >> Mirja, >> >> Is there a draft or RFC for TCP encapsulation that is being discussed? >> >> Tom >> >> >> See you all in London! >> >> Mirja and Spencer >> >