I guess in many cases the concern is simply that UDP is more often block than TCP…
> Am 07.03.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Joe Touch <[email protected]>: > > Fwiw, ick. I am hoping the pending UDP options and their frag support while > allowing frag traversal of NATs will help discourage use of TCP this way. > > Joe > >> On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Tom, >> >> no, this is more a topic that we as the AD would like to discuss with the >> community as we see more and more work that adds TCP encapsulation to all >> kind of protocols for middlebox traversal issues. >> >> Mirja >> >>> Am 07.03.2018 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Herbert <[email protected]>: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mar 7, 2018 8:16 AM, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> we plan to have a short (1h) TSV area meeting in London and are scheduled >>> for >>> >>> tsvarea Session 1 (1:00:00) >>> Monday, Afternoon Session III 1740-1840 >>> Room Name: Sandringham size: 300 >>> >>> We just uploaded the planned agenda: >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-tsvarea >>> >>> Besides the usual updates and status report, we are planning for a >>> discussion about TCP encapsulation with a corresponding presentation about >>> experience with TCP encapsulation for IKE. >>> >>> Mirja, >>> >>> Is there a draft or RFC for TCP encapsulation that is being discussed? >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> See you all in London! >>> >>> Mirja and Spencer >>> >> >
