> On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:39 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I guess in many cases the concern is simply that UDP is more often block than > TCP…
Sure. Can’t do much about that motivation at the endpoints. Joe > > >> Am 07.03.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Joe Touch <[email protected]>: >> >> Fwiw, ick. I am hoping the pending UDP options and their frag support while >> allowing frag traversal of NATs will help discourage use of TCP this way. >> >> Joe >> >>> On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> no, this is more a topic that we as the AD would like to discuss with the >>> community as we see more and more work that adds TCP encapsulation to all >>> kind of protocols for middlebox traversal issues. >>> >>> Mirja >>> >>>> Am 07.03.2018 um 17:56 schrieb Tom Herbert <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 7, 2018 8:16 AM, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> we plan to have a short (1h) TSV area meeting in London and are scheduled >>>> for >>>> >>>> tsvarea Session 1 (1:00:00) >>>> Monday, Afternoon Session III 1740-1840 >>>> Room Name: Sandringham size: 300 >>>> >>>> We just uploaded the planned agenda: >>>> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-tsvarea >>>> >>>> Besides the usual updates and status report, we are planning for a >>>> discussion about TCP encapsulation with a corresponding presentation about >>>> experience with TCP encapsulation for IKE. >>>> >>>> Mirja, >>>> >>>> Is there a draft or RFC for TCP encapsulation that is being discussed? >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> >>>> See you all in London! >>>> >>>> Mirja and Spencer >>>> >>> >> >
