On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 16:16:32 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote: > On 09/25/2014 04:04 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > > Would you mind testing Ninja (with CMake, gn, gyp, or hand-written) as > > well? I'm curious (and it could give a good baseline for how fast the > > build could be) as to the difference. > > Actually I guess we could determine the baseline with the new (and not > exactly 100% bug-free (; - https://github.com/gittup/tup/issues/179 ) > feature - tup generate. It generates shell script with all the commands > that need to be executed. I guess no tool can be faster than that, > rigth? There are however many problems with this feature right now, so > there is no project that I could test it on - each one produces a > different error...
Does the generated script do parallel builds (like I imagine Tup does)? --Ben -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
