On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 22:35:26 -0400, Mike Shal wrote: > 500ms isn't too bad for a development loop, though it seems kinda long for > such a small project. What happens when the project is 10x or 100x as big? > Will it take 10x or 100x as long? And this is ignoring the time to generate > the ninja files, right?
That isn't 500ms for each directory, it's 500ms / 45 for each (so ~11ms each). With my recent performance patches to CMake it takes about 600ms (used to be around 4-6 seconds) to generate the Ninja files (which only really happens on file addition/removal, test addition/removal, and direct CMake changes). The most common time to regenerate the files is when the branch changes anyways. --Ben -- -- tup-users mailing list email: [email protected] unsubscribe: [email protected] options: http://groups.google.com/group/tup-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tup-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
