The recent freshmeat announcement of JDO caught my eye: Any thoughts
on the viability of JDO with or instead of Torque as a persistence
standard?
from http://www.techtrader.com/products/jdo.html ...
With Sun's new JDO standard, hand-coding SQL is not
necessary. Now, developers can access databases through Java
alone. The JDO standard defines an API that developers use to
communicate with the database through Java code. This code
communicates with the JDO implementation, which, in turn, creates
SQL and communicates with the database.
And now, just weeks after the Proposed Final Draft of the JDO
specification has been submitted (May 10, 2001), the first JDO
implementation to support the standard is available: Kodo
This particular implementation is not free software, but that does not
mean JDO (as an open standard) would not make sense in Turbine apps.
Comments?
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TeleDynamics Communications Inc
Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems: http://www.teledyn.com
"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."(Pablo Picasso)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
