----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Lawrence Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 8:15 AM
Subject: Torque vs JDO?
>
> The recent freshmeat announcement of JDO caught my eye: Any thoughts
> on the viability of JDO with or instead of Torque as a persistence
> standard?
>
> from http://www.techtrader.com/products/jdo.html ...
>
> With Sun's new JDO standard, hand-coding SQL is not
> necessary. Now, developers can access databases through Java
> alone. The JDO standard defines an API that developers use to
> communicate with the database through Java code. This code
> communicates with the JDO implementation, which, in turn, creates
> SQL and communicates with the database.
>
> And now, just weeks after the Proposed Final Draft of the JDO
> specification has been submitted (May 10, 2001), the first JDO
> implementation to support the standard is available: Kodo
>
> This particular implementation is not free software, but that does not
> mean JDO (as an open standard) would not make sense in Turbine apps.
>
> Comments?
here is the official site for jdo
http://access1.sun.com/jdo/
- Kasper
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
