on 6/17/01 8:40 PM, "Gary Lawrence Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. I was under the impression that Castor was an opensource
> implementation of the JDO; certainly $71k (or even the $500/seat
> for other JDO implementations I've seen) is enough of a reason.
Nope...doesn't look like it implements any of the Sun JDO's interfaces, so
I'm not really sure how it is a Sun JDO implementation.
<http://castor.exolab.org/api/org/exolab/castor/jdo/JDO.html>
/me thinks JDO is an overloaded acronym and you got bitten by that.
Personally, I think Castor is much harder to setup/use/modify than Peer's. I
don't think Peer's are perfect, but they certainly are easy to use.
-jon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
