On 7/5/01 9:19 AM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Stevens wrote:
>>
>> on 7/3/01 1:51 PM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Tomcat 4.0b5
>>
>> Try CVS HEAD of Tomcat...
>
> I really don't want 50 millian CVS HEAD projects on my machine to build
> a current TDK.
The TDK is not meant to be built by everyone. It is meant for binary
distributions and requires many projects.
Have you tried 2.1 final where we know that the catalina problem has been
fixed?
> Is Turbine so dependant on the bleeding edge that it can't
> work with released projects?
The TDK exists to make development easy at first, you can take the
generated app and put it in any servlet container you like.
> Will it work with Tomcat 3.3? I know that
> works well and is performant.
Yup.
> Turbine build process requires several projects to be checked out on my
> machine, and Tomcat almost doubles it. It is a royal PITA. I just want
> a simple "build.bat" and "build.sh" with all required jars included in
> the proper locations. The Turbine and Tomcat build processes are a real
> pain.
Than use the TDK 2.1.
> I need a solution that works with _released_ products, and could possibly
> be used with other Servlet Containers than Apache Tomcat. Can Turbine
> be _easily_ used in other Servlet Containers?
Yes, it can.
> Also, is Turbine considered alpha due to API upheaval? Deprecation is a
> tool, but it seems like everything on the site is outdated, and Turbine
> is a moving target.
2.2 is yes. If you want something that won't change than use 2.1.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
