On 7/24/01 12:05 AM, "John McNally" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It does not mean that. I think the plan is something like Turbine
> becomes an interface and then there will be two (or more?)
> implementations: TurbineServlet and TurbineStandalone.
Turbine stand-alone, used via TurbineConfig was a way to get
at the services. The services have been separate and if you need,
for example, the DBService than you will be able to use Fulcrum.
Turbine will effectively become a rendering mechanism that
utilized the Fulcrum services framework to gather and transform
data for rendering. The services and torque will soon no longer
be a part of turbine.
The only reason anyone used TurbineConfig was to use the services,
and you will be able to do the same thing with Fulcrum but it
will be much easier to use.
> john mcnally
>
> Oki DZ wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Colin Chalmers wrote:
>>
>>> If you're using the latest version from CVS you'll find that this class has
>>> been removed.
>>
>> Does that mean there would be no more standalone Turbine?
>>
>> Oki
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
