On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, John McNally wrote:
> It does not mean that. I think the plan is something like Turbine
> becomes an interface and then there will be two (or more?)
> implementations: TurbineServlet and TurbineStandalone.
I see...
BTW, I think it would be nice to have a "named" global cache in
TurbineGlobalCache. I don't know how many people would like to have the
feature, but I think a single global cache in an app is too limiting. It's
not about the caches' capacity, but rather the (necessity imposed by )
different kind of objects that should be put in the caches. And also,
having a cache that doesn't need any kind of id would be nice too; just
put everything into it, and getObject() would return the first entered
object in the cache.
Just an idea (ehm.. ouch.. well, it's a need).
Oki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
