On 7/24/01 2:12 AM, "Oki DZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, John McNally wrote:
>
>> It does not mean that. I think the plan is something like Turbine
>> becomes an interface and then there will be two (or more?)
>> implementations: TurbineServlet and TurbineStandalone.
>
> I see...
>
> BTW, I think it would be nice to have a "named" global cache in
> TurbineGlobalCache. I don't know how many people would like to have the
> feature, but I think a single global cache in an app is too limiting. It's
> not about the caches' capacity, but rather the (necessity imposed by )
> different kind of objects that should be put in the caches. And also,
> having a cache that doesn't need any kind of id would be nice too; just
> put everything into it, and getObject() would return the first entered
> object in the cache.
>
> Just an idea (ehm.. ouch.. well, it's a need).
I think I'm going to try Aaron's jpolycache which looks like it will
support this.
> Oki
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
