Hi I have come out a comparison chart between Castor JDO and Torque at the URL below: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim/main/template/omcompare.vm
The response time to my web server is a bit slow ... If someone could give me something similar to jRF and perhaps others, I would update accordingly to compare the differences between the different open-source object relational library available. If there are other criteria which I have missed out, feel free to tell me on it. As for performance, anybody got any comments on a good way to measure the performance across different object relational libraries ? Regards ========== Ian Lim email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Saunders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Turbine Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:19 AM Subject: Anyone tried JRF? > On the topic of Castor v Torque , has anyone else > tried jRF (java Relational Framework) ? > (I am aware of at least 1 jRF guru on the forum!) > > I am using it quite successfully and would recommend it. > One thing I do like about jRF is that is has a neat way > of doing joins. Instead of having to hack your SQL, it has > a concept of nested objects, > Eg instead of writing a conventinal SQL join, where each tuple maps to > a 'StudentTest' Object , instead each Student object has a list > of Test objects, which can be accessed like: > #foreach($s in $studentList) > Student is $s.getStudentname > #foreach($t in $s.FindForTests() > Scored: $t.getScore() for test $t.getTestName() > #end > #end > > This is how I use it. The trickiest thing was setting up the > connection pool; that was a bit of a hack using Turbine service > but it works fine. Go to the web site if you want to read > more http://jrf.sourceforge.net > > I would recommend it as a comparable alternative to Torque. > > pat. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
