Hi If you could give me a list of yes/no against the criteria, or any other extra criteria. I am willing to update accordingly :).
If not, I have to download it and try out to see whether it could fit the criterias listed which will take me a bit more time. Glad to hear about the code-generation part. I went to the website and see the examples where the part that should be code generated are hardcoded, already no mood to go further :P Regards ========== Ian Lim email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Turbine Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:50 PM Subject: Re: Anyone tried JRF? > FYI - Version 2 of jRF will have some important speed improvements. > PreparedStatements and code-generation of setter/getter calls instead > of reflection. > > Jonathan Carlson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ian Lim wrote: > > >Hi > > > >I have come out a comparison chart between Castor JDO and Torque > >at the URL below: > >http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim/main/template/omcompare.vm > > > >The response time to my web server is a bit slow ... > > > >If someone could give me something similar to jRF and perhaps others, > >I would update accordingly to compare the differences between > >the different open-source object relational library available. > > > >If there are other criteria which I have missed out, > >feel free to tell me on it. > > > >As for performance, anybody got any comments on a good way to measure > >the performance across different object relational libraries ? > > > >Regards > >========== > >Ian Lim > >email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
