Hi Thanks for the features comparison provided. I have updated my website to put in JRF side-by-side with Castor and Torque. Just a few points to clarify: 1) Does JRF has some way to generate SQL? 2) Do you have the link to Univ of Indiana's website regarding their source code generator ? 3) In order to make JRF J2EE compatible, anything else require? For example, Castor JDO needs a JMX bean or a connector architecture to tie it to the app server.
Regards ========== Ian Lim email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Turbine Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 04:32 AM Subject: Re: Anyone tried JRF? > Ian, I hope I understood your questions correctly. > > OpenSource = Yes > Connection Pooling = Yes > Template Based Source Code Generation = No, but can generate source > using an existing database. Univ of Indiana is creating an XML-driven > source code generator that they will open-source. > Template Based SQL Statement Generation = No, it doesn't use templates > to generate SQL > Multiple Column Primary Key = Yes > Key Generators = Yes, but db specific > J2EE scalability = Yes, via Stateless Session Beans, not recommended to > use for Entity Beans, but it could probably be done. Entity Beans don't > scale well anyways. > Lazy Loading = Yes, because most relationships are manually coded > Caching = No > > Jonathan > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
