Ian, I hope I understood your questions correctly. OpenSource = Yes Connection Pooling = Yes Template Based Source Code Generation = No, but can generate source using an existing database. Univ of Indiana is creating an XML-driven source code generator that they will open-source. Template Based SQL Statement Generation = No, it doesn't use templates to generate SQL Multiple Column Primary Key = Yes Key Generators = Yes, but db specific J2EE scalability = Yes, via Stateless Session Beans, not recommended to use for Entity Beans, but it could probably be done. Entity Beans don't scale well anyways. Lazy Loading = Yes, because most relationships are manually coded Caching = No
Jonathan Ian Lim wrote: >Hi > >If you could give me a list of yes/no against the criteria, >or any other extra criteria. I am willing to update accordingly :). > >If not, I have to download it and try out to see whether it >could fit the criterias listed which will take me a bit more time. > >Glad to hear about the code-generation part. > >I went to the website and see the examples where the part that >should be code generated are hardcoded, already no mood >to go further :P > >Regards >========== >Ian Lim >email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jonathan Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Turbine Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:50 PM >Subject: Re: Anyone tried JRF? > > >>FYI - Version 2 of jRF will have some important speed improvements. >> PreparedStatements and code-generation of setter/getter calls instead >>of reflection. >> >>Jonathan Carlson >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Ian Lim wrote: >> >>>Hi >>> >>>I have come out a comparison chart between Castor JDO and Torque >>>at the URL below: >>>http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim/main/template/omcompare.vm >>> >>>The response time to my web server is a bit slow ... >>> >>>If someone could give me something similar to jRF and perhaps others, >>>I would update accordingly to compare the differences between >>>the different open-source object relational library available. >>> >>>If there are other criteria which I have missed out, >>>feel free to tell me on it. >>> >>>As for performance, anybody got any comments on a good way to measure >>>the performance across different object relational libraries ? >>> >>>Regards >>>========== >>>Ian Lim >>>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim >>> > > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
