on 12/11/99 6:32 AM, Scott Tavares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well... with this information, does any still see the need to continue with
> OPaL? It seems to me that Object Persistence is pretty well covered. What
> does every one else think?
>
> -ScottTavares-
Actually, most of the solutions on that page were either commercial or
didn't seem that good.
OPaL is cool.
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
