Lets just document that User == Visitor.
After the previous discussion, here is how I would like to see things
re-packaged...I also question putting the "om" package within the "util"
package. Ie: should it be:
org.apache.turbine.om
or
org.apache.turbine.util.om
???
Below it is as the first case. I'm open to have it as the second case. Give
me input please.
I'm also suggesting moving the OM specific stuff out of the db package and
into the OM package. OM is essentially our first pass at what will
eventually just be OPaL based, but isn't quite there yet until OPaL is
finished. I'm also suggesting renaming the "db" package to "dbpool" to be
more specific.
org.apache.turbine.om
BaseObject.java
BasePeer.java
ColumnMap.java
DatabaseMap.java
DatabaseMapBuilder.java
LargeSelect.java
Query.java
SQLExpression.java
TableMap.java
org.apache.turbine.om.user
TurbineUser.java
User.java
UserFactory.java
org.apache.turbine.om.user.peer
TurbineUserPeer.java
VisitorRolePeer.java
org.apache.turbine.om.security
AccessControlBuilder.java
AccessControlList.java
DefaultAccessControl.java
LoginFailedException.java (Renamed from LogonFailedException.java)
Permission.java
PermissionSet.java
Role.java
RoleSet.java
org.apache.turbine.om.security.peer
RolePermissionPeer.java
PermissionPeer.java
RolePeer.java
org.apache.turbine.util.dbpool (Renamed from org.apache.turbine.util.db)
Comments?
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
