on 2/10/00 3:07 PM, Nissim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some questions about opl and turbine..
>
> 1) Is the plan for OPL to replace the use of village everywhere in
> turbine?
OPaL isn't really a replacement for Village. It doesn't have to use Village,
but I personally think that is a bad idea no to.
Village is simply a wrapper around JDBC. OPaL is a
object->relational->object mapping system.
> 2) Is there a DTD someplace for what the XML schema would look like?
There is an example in the Turbine package somewhere for jyve.
> 3) Is the XML schema going to be optional with a data dictionary
> implemented as tables in the DB as an alternative?
I don't know.
-jon
--
Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation
Conference! <http://ApacheCon.Com/>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
