Re: can we make turbine extensions more pluggable?

[mbryson]

Turbine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

With this implementation, you wouldn't need to
hard-code initializations for the Turbine scheduler or
OPaL in the init method.  You could also take care of
destroying services.

Does the manager initialize the actor itself or is the initialization done by an 
explicit call to the actor?  In the case of the scheduler it's thread needs to be 
started automatically at Turbine init().

dave   



------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]