--- "Kevin A. Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> george stewart wrote:
> <snip>
> > I agree with Kevin that xml/xsl is much better
> > technology. I don't know why you haven't embedded
> the
> > Xalan XSLT engine in Turbine. This would be much
> > easier to use than cocoon and more flexible.
> <snip>
>
> I am not sure it is appropriate. The point with XML
> publishing is what
> Cocoon is doing. Different stylesheets for
> different clients, dynamic
> content, etc. Static XML doesn't really give you
> this.
I intended that the xml document in my pseudo code was
a DOM. It's very easy to manipulate XML data with
DOM. It's also very simple to use a combination of
class maps and introspection to produce a DOM from a
data class.
>
> If you want to include XSLT support see
> org.apache.jetspeed.SimpleTransform
>
> Kevin
I'll take a look.
Kevin, aren't you a big fan of Castor for xml
persistence. Look at quick at www.jxml.com. It's
OSS, and Bill LaForge is the author. He approached
Apache about sponsoring it, but Apache wasn't
interested. Quick builds a SAX parser dynamically
based on a schema which Bill calls qjml. It does both
xml=>java and java=>xml. I've very impressed with
qjml. It does a great job of xml=>java and provides
data validation with property editors.
- george
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
