Giacomo Pati wrote:
>
> "Kevin A. Burton" wrote:
> >
> > jon * wrote:
> > >
> > > on 3/31/00 6:14 PM, Kevin A. Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > -1. Why not use ECS? I don't like the fact that Webmacro is required.
> > > > Lets eat our own Dogfood here and use Cocoon(XSP) or ECS.
> > > >
> > >
> > <snip>
> >
> > I should have probably officially just done a -0. Wasn't that strong
> > but hadn't had my morning coffee yet.
> >
> > > Because Webmacro allows you to more separate the UI from the layout. it is
> > > an alternative to people who don't want to use Cocoon quite yet (including
> > > myself)...
> >
> > I don't like the way we aren't using cocoon for this. We have an
> > official Apache project dedicated to separating the UI from the layout.
> > +1024 for MVC design and separating the API/logic from the
> > presentation. But lets use our own tools. IMO Webmacro is a dead end
> > technology. XML is the future. If you aren't using it you are
> > seriously limiting your potential.
>
> It is maybe a little be off topic but as I am playing with Cocoon 2 I've
> tried to turn Turbine into a Cocoon 2 generator. No, it was not working
> because Turbine is emitting html instead of xml. But I had it going
> until the Login screen was emitted (and the cocoon parser complained
> about wrong input). Did anybody thought of the possibility turning
> Turbine into a Cocoon 2 generator?
I have a similar problem for Jetspeed. Portlets can output anything
they want. Even just garbage. So I am going to wrap that into a CDATA
section and then just return that to the client.
> Giacomo
<snip>
--
Kevin A Burton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://relativity.yi.org
Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!"
"For evil to win is for good men to do nothing."
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
